From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: review: More frame options in window functions |
Date: | 2010-01-20 10:06:28 |
Message-ID: | 162867791001200206x487b32d9k8b6428add5160283@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/19 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/1/19 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Yeah, that's my point, too. The planner has to distinguish "four" from
>> sort pathkeys and to teach the executor the simple information which
>> column should be used to determine frame. I was bit wrong because some
>> of current executor code isn't like it, like using ordNumCols == 0 to
>> know whether partition equals to frame, though....
>
> And here's another version to fix this problem (I hope). Now the
> planner distinguish sort column from actual significant pathkeys. I
> tested it on both of 32bit and 64bit Linux.
>
I tested it, and reported problems are fixed
Thank you
Pavel
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Hitoshi Harada
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-01-20 10:23:43 | Re: lock_timeout GUC patch |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-01-20 10:04:35 | Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby |