Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause
Date: 2024-08-14 11:46:23
Message-ID: e0573967-76ff-4f89-82f6-a867edb7c016@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13.08.24 07:46, Peter Smith wrote:
> While reviewing another thread I had cause to be looking more
> carefully at the SEQUENCE documentation.
>
> I found it curious that, unlike other clauses, the syntax of the CYCLE
> clause was not displayed on a line by itself.
>
> I have changed that, and at the same time I have moved the CYCLE
> syntax (plus its description) to be adjacent to MINVALUE/MAXVALUE,
> which IMO is where it naturally belongs.
>
> Please see the attached patch.

I agree, it makes a bit more sense with your patches.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2024-08-14 12:34:06 Re: [PATCH] Add get_bytes() and set_bytes() functions
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-08-14 11:38:07 Re: Thread-safe nl_langinfo() and localeconv()