| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause |
| Date: | 2024-08-14 11:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | e0573967-76ff-4f89-82f6-a867edb7c016@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.08.24 07:46, Peter Smith wrote:
> While reviewing another thread I had cause to be looking more
> carefully at the SEQUENCE documentation.
>
> I found it curious that, unlike other clauses, the syntax of the CYCLE
> clause was not displayed on a line by itself.
>
> I have changed that, and at the same time I have moved the CYCLE
> syntax (plus its description) to be adjacent to MINVALUE/MAXVALUE,
> which IMO is where it naturally belongs.
>
> Please see the attached patch.
I agree, it makes a bit more sense with your patches.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2024-08-14 12:34:06 | Re: [PATCH] Add get_bytes() and set_bytes() functions |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-08-14 11:38:07 | Re: Thread-safe nl_langinfo() and localeconv() |