Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause
Date: 2024-08-20 00:18:15
Message-ID: ZsPgx7ORCpZRdbLi@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 13.08.24 07:46, Peter Smith wrote:
> > While reviewing another thread I had cause to be looking more
> > carefully at the SEQUENCE documentation.
> >
> > I found it curious that, unlike other clauses, the syntax of the CYCLE
> > clause was not displayed on a line by itself.
> >
> > I have changed that, and at the same time I have moved the CYCLE
> > syntax (plus its description) to be adjacent to MINVALUE/MAXVALUE,
> > which IMO is where it naturally belongs.
> >
> > Please see the attached patch.
>
> I agree, it makes a bit more sense with your patches.

Great, patch applied to master.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-08-20 01:40:41 Re: Speed up Hash Join by teaching ExprState about hashing
Previous Message jian he 2024-08-20 00:00:00 Re: on_error table, saving error info to a table