Re: recoveryCheck test failure on flaviventris

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Richard Guo' <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: recoveryCheck test failure on flaviventris
Date: 2025-04-16 18:00:00
Message-ID: de984269-a1b0-421a-a8e4-5f47918898fb@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Kuroda-san,

16.04.2025 11:12, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Dear Richard, Alexander,
>
> FYI - I felt there is a same type of failure [1] for REL_17_STABLE, added in the wikipage.
> Feel free to revert it if I did something wrong.
>
> [1]:https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=prion&dt=2025-04-15%2016%3A16%3A06&stg=recovery-check

Thank you for adding that! (I'm a bit slow on analyzing new failures, but
I hope I could catch up on the weekend.)
I've just reformatted the record to match my script's [1] expectations.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b62f97b1-bbff-42cd-861f-c785f0774ab8%40gmail.com

Best regards,
Alexander Lakhin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-04-16 18:07:45 Re: A modest proposal: make parser/rewriter/planner inputs read-only
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2025-04-16 17:50:44 Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes