On 4/16/25 18:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe we would like to have some enforced contract about what
> subquery_planner can and can't touch in the outer planner level's
> data, but I'm not feeling a great need for that right now.
I wouldn't say I'm entirely convinced that side effects are absent, but
multiple copies of the same query tree look messy now. It makes sense to
try this way and see what happens.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov