Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kirk Parker <khp(at)equatoria(dot)us>, pbaumard(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
Date: 2023-06-23 02:01:45
Message-ID: de8f2b8a-969b-455e-ee2d-0e2d144ff3ff@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 6/22/23 9:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> "With multiple decades of development behind it, PostgreSQL.."
>
> +1. It sure seems silly trying to automate changing this.

+1. With the proposed language, we can revisit it once it gets to
"centuries."

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2023-06-23 12:28:35 Re: streaming replication depends on matching glibc versions / LOCALE sort order
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-06-23 01:23:59 Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history