From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Kirk Parker <khp(at)equatoria(dot)us>, pbaumard(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history |
Date: | 2023-06-24 02:50:20 |
Message-ID: | ZJZZ7Pl0MMa8VGOp@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:01:45PM -0400, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> On 6/22/23 9:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> > > "With multiple decades of development behind it, PostgreSQL.."
> >
> > +1. It sure seems silly trying to automate changing this.
>
> +1. With the proposed language, we can revisit it once it gets to
> "centuries."
Applied patch is "With decades of development".
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-06-24 11:16:54 | Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-06-24 01:20:35 | Re: bad choice of the word in sentence |