From: | Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: feeding big script to psql |
Date: | 2005-08-02 17:45:07 |
Message-ID: | dcobf3$1v2p$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I was a little busy with deadlines at the time but I saved the database
in it's slow configuration so I could investigate during a quieter period.
I'll do a restore now and see whether I can remember back to April when
I came across this issue.
Pete
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> I found a while ago that after inserting a lot of rows into a clean
>> Postgres table it would take several minutes just to analyse a command,
>> not even starting the execution.
>
> Oh? Could you provide a test case for this? I can certainly believe
> that the planner might choose a bad plan if it has no statistics, but
> it shouldn't take a long time to do it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Madison Kelly | 2005-08-02 17:48:51 | Re: indexes are fucked |
Previous Message | Dan Armbrust | 2005-08-02 17:44:59 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup |