Re: feeding big script to psql

From: Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: feeding big script to psql
Date: 2005-08-02 17:45:07
Message-ID: dcobf3$1v2p$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I was a little busy with deadlines at the time but I saved the database
in it's slow configuration so I could investigate during a quieter period.

I'll do a restore now and see whether I can remember back to April when
I came across this issue.

Pete

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> I found a while ago that after inserting a lot of rows into a clean
>> Postgres table it would take several minutes just to analyse a command,
>> not even starting the execution.
>
> Oh? Could you provide a test case for this? I can certainly believe
> that the planner might choose a bad plan if it has no statistics, but
> it shouldn't take a long time to do it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Madison Kelly 2005-08-02 17:48:51 Re: indexes are fucked
Previous Message Dan Armbrust 2005-08-02 17:44:59 Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup