From: | Dan Armbrust <daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup |
Date: | 2005-08-02 17:44:59 |
Message-ID: | 42EFB11B.1060703@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Jaime Casanova wrote:
<blockquote cite="midc2d9e70e050802101941a74849(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 8/2/05, Dan Armbrust <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com"><daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've been trying to track down some performance problems that I am
having doing large inserts on tables with foreign keys.
I'm 99% sure that the issue I am having is BUG 1552 -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php</a>
When I read the whole thread, I got the impression that a fix (or maybe
a hack) had been put into the 8.0 branch. I'm running 8.0.3, and I'm
seeing the issue. I can go into more details if desired...
So my questions are:
1) Would that fix have made it into the 8.0.3 release - alternatively,
how can I figure that out myself?
2) Is there a bug tracker somewhere, or do you just track bugs on the
mailing list? I haven't been able to find anything on your site.
Thanks,
Dan
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What part of the discussion gives you that impression... I understood
that Tom will (in the future) see a fix when Neil finish the framework
to replan prepared statements (or is rebuild cached plans where the
table size has grow significantly?)
PD: This is not the list for this discussion... i am forwarding you to
another(randomly choosen) list.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<tt>This posting seems to indicate that there was a change made:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php</a><br>
<br>
</tt><br>
What is the proper way to discuss bugs? The only thing I have found on
the website is the link for reporting new bugs, (which just sends an
e-mail to the bugs mailing list?)<br>
<br>
Since I didn't see any bug tracker software, I figured (wrongly) that
you must just discuss bugs on the bugs list...<br>
<br>
Dan<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://informatics.mayo.edu/">http://informatics.mayo.edu/</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/html | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-08-02 18:30:17 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-08-02 17:19:25 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Wilson | 2005-08-02 17:45:07 | Re: feeding big script to psql |
Previous Message | Oliver Siegmar | 2005-08-02 17:42:57 | Re: Problem with dropping a tablespace |