Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup

From: Dan Armbrust <daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup
Date: 2005-08-02 17:44:59
Message-ID: 42EFB11B.1060703@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Jaime Casanova wrote:
<blockquote cite="midc2d9e70e050802101941a74849(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 8/2/05, Dan Armbrust <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com">&lt;daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com&gt;</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've been trying to track down some performance problems that I am
having doing large inserts on tables with foreign keys.

I'm 99% sure that the issue I am having is BUG 1552 -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php</a>

When I read the whole thread, I got the impression that a fix (or maybe
a hack) had been put into the 8.0 branch. I'm running 8.0.3, and I'm
seeing the issue. I can go into more details if desired...

So my questions are:
1) Would that fix have made it into the 8.0.3 release - alternatively,
how can I figure that out myself?
2) Is there a bug tracker somewhere, or do you just track bugs on the
mailing list? I haven't been able to find anything on your site.

Thanks,

Dan

</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What part of the discussion gives you that impression... I understood
that Tom will (in the future) see a fix when Neil finish the framework
to replan prepared statements (or is rebuild cached plans where the
table size has grow significantly?)

PD: This is not the list for this discussion... i am forwarding you to
another(randomly choosen) list.

</pre>
</blockquote>
<tt>This posting seems to indicate that there was a change made:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00183.php</a><br>
<br>
</tt><br>
What is the proper way to discuss bugs?&nbsp; The only thing I have found on
the website is the link for reporting new bugs, (which just sends an
e-mail to the bugs mailing list?)<br>
<br>
Since I didn't see any bug tracker software, I figured (wrongly) that
you must just discuss bugs on the bugs list...<br>
<br>
Dan<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://informatics.mayo.edu/">http://informatics.mayo.edu/</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/html 2.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2005-08-02 18:30:17 Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2005-08-02 17:19:25 Re: [BUGS] BUG #1552 followup

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Wilson 2005-08-02 17:45:07 Re: feeding big script to psql
Previous Message Oliver Siegmar 2005-08-02 17:42:57 Re: Problem with dropping a tablespace