Re: vacuum issues under load?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum issues under load?
Date: 2010-01-19 01:35:11
Message-ID: dcc563d11001181735j24e9c6b0r9d6c09bbe0c5462b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
<kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 08:41:38AM -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> With slony 2.0.3 or so, I had occasional complete lockups of my
>> database that I didn't have time to troubleshoot as it was a live
>> cluster and I had to restart slony and the databases to get them back
>> up and running.
>
> With slony 2.0.2 I had similar problems. A CREATE INDEX on the slave
> caused slony on the slave to block while inserting into the table which
> eventually blocked the server during the log switch (TRUNCATE) which
> eventually blocked everything else.

You could have used create index interactively.

> It occurs to me that the slony daemon should be able to get the
> TRUNCATE command to abort if it takes too long.

No, I don't want it stopping my truncates.

The problem I ran into was on a db with no creating indexes, no
truncates nothing like that going on. It runs fine for a week or two,
then hangs hard. No updates, no selects, nothing works. There are no
locks in the way that I can see, just hung database.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-01-19 01:36:17 Re: vacuum issues under load?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-01-19 01:29:33 Re: number of page slots needed (1576544) exceeds max_fsm_pages (204800)]