On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Reid Thompson <reid(dot)thompson(at)ateb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Does this max_fsm_pages value seem OK for a 46GB database?
>> I've clustered all the tables that seemed to be exhibiting large amounts
>> of bloat.
>
> My big DB is about 70 on disk. I have fsm pages set to 3.4 million,
> and occasionally that gets overrun. It is nearly catastrophic to us
We have about 2.8Million used and have it set to 10Million for the
same reason as you do.