Re: panic failed to add item

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Access is pretty random actually, and fill factor on this database is
>> 100% because it doesn't really get updated, just appended to.  There
>> are a lot of parallel insertions going on if that helps.
>
> Do you mean you actually have fillfactor set somewhere?  It didn't show
> on the \d output.

No, I just assumed it was 100% still by default. Did that change?

> Is this a 32-bit or 64-bit machine?

64 bit. Centos / RHEL 5.3 running the -95 or so Centos 5.2 kernel
because later kernels cause problems with the Areca 1680 series RAID
array controller kicking offline at odd times