Re: panic failed to add item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: panic failed to add item
Date: 2009-11-20 23:03:09
Message-ID: 18773.1258758189@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Access is pretty random actually, and fill factor on this database is
> 100% because it doesn't really get updated, just appended to. There
> are a lot of parallel insertions going on if that helps.

Do you mean you actually have fillfactor set somewhere? It didn't show
on the \d output.

Is this a 32-bit or 64-bit machine?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-20 23:14:47 Re: panic failed to add item
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-20 22:19:26 Re: panic failed to add item