From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Schnabel <schnabelr(at)missouri(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, cb <cb(at)mythtech(dot)net>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |
Date: | 2009-11-16 20:52:29 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10911161252h4c0e0036pd9d30bde86e7fccf@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> wrote:
> Dave Crooke wrote:
>> My reply about server failure was shwoing what could go wrong at the
>> server level assuming a first-class, properly run data center, with
>> fully redundant power, including a server with dual power supplies on
>> separate cords fed by separate UPS'es etc. ....
> Never had a motherboard short out either eh? China makes really GOOD
> electrolytic caps these days (I can show you several SERVER CLASS boards
> that were on conditioned power and popped 'em, rendering the board dead
> instantly.)
>
> Murphy is a bastard.
You know about the whole capacitor caper from a few years back, where
this one plant was making corrosive electrolyte and a huge number of
capacitor suppliers were buying from them. Mobos from that era are
terrible. Caps that expand and burst after anywhere from a few months
to a few years of use. ugh.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2009-11-16 20:55:14 | Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-11-16 20:50:39 | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |