Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Schnabel <schnabelr(at)missouri(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, cb <cb(at)mythtech(dot)net>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Date: 2009-11-16 20:52:29
Message-ID: dcc563d10911161252h4c0e0036pd9d30bde86e7fccf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> wrote:
> Dave Crooke wrote:
>> My reply about server failure was shwoing what could go wrong at the
>> server level assuming a first-class, properly run data center, with
>> fully redundant power, including a server with dual power supplies on
>> separate cords fed by separate UPS'es etc. ....
> Never had a motherboard short out either eh?  China makes really GOOD
> electrolytic caps these days (I can show you several SERVER CLASS boards
> that were on conditioned power and popped 'em, rendering the board dead
> instantly.)
>
> Murphy is a bastard.

You know about the whole capacitor caper from a few years back, where
this one plant was making corrosive electrolyte and a huge number of
capacitor suppliers were buying from them. Mobos from that era are
terrible. Caps that expand and burst after anywhere from a few months
to a few years of use. ugh.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2009-11-16 20:55:14 Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-16 20:50:39 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?