| From: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Schnabel <schnabelr(at)missouri(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, cb <cb(at)mythtech(dot)net>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |
| Date: | 2009-11-16 20:32:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4B01B6E0.702@denninger.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Dave Crooke wrote:
> My reply about server failure was shwoing what could go wrong at the
> server level assuming a first-class, properly run data center, with
> fully redundant power, including a server with dual power supplies on
> separate cords fed by separate UPS'es etc. ....
Never had a motherboard short out either eh? China makes really GOOD
electrolytic caps these days (I can show you several SERVER CLASS boards
that were on conditioned power and popped 'em, rendering the board dead
instantly.)
Murphy is a bastard.
-- Karl
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| karl.vcf | text/x-vcard | 124 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Schnabel | 2009-11-16 20:32:51 | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |
| Previous Message | Dave Crooke | 2009-11-16 20:23:24 | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |