| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brooks Lyrette <brooks(dot)lyrette(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Help with postgresql memory issue |
| Date: | 2009-11-03 01:01:46 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10911021701x4af0cc58t83274bb7d0988c4b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Brooks Lyrette <brooks(dot)lyrette(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I wish the solution was that simple. I rent the zone and that is my
> providers cap.
Am I misunderstanding this? You rent an image with 32Gigs of ram.
Your provider limits you to any single process / application being 1G
total by a cap? Then what good is the 32Gigs of ram? It's like
seeing the promised land but never allowed to enter. And what reason
would they have for capping a single app inside the vm? It's already
using 32Gig, so I don't see them saving any memory.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-11-03 02:49:45 | Re: Failed to update RowID generator |
| Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2009-11-03 00:42:43 | Re: R-Trees in PostgreSQL |