Re: R-Trees in PostgreSQL

From: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: R-Trees in PostgreSQL
Date: 2009-11-03 00:42:43
Message-ID: 30fe546d0911021642u2c76ee95t1e1e8c8aafd32d9b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Also for one-dimensional ranges, consider contrib/seg

P.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 00:25 +0100, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
>> I'd like to know what kind of functions I have to implement for a R-Tree
>> index on numeric columns,
>
> NUMERIC is scalar, so an R-Tree doesn't make much sense. You can install
> btree_gist (a contrib module) to be able to use numeric columns as part
> of a GiST index.
>
> If you have more complex spatial data, you should look into PostGIS.
>
> Regards,
>        Jeff Davis
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-03 01:01:46 Re: Help with postgresql memory issue
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-11-03 00:41:19 Re: R-Trees in PostgreSQL