From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Matt Magoffin <postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5 |
Date: | 2009-02-09 20:34:34 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10902091234t6823cb69w7b591256453ab246@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matt Magoffin <postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us> wrote:
>> * Matt Magoffin (postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us) wrote:
>>> [root(at)170226-db7 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
>>> CommitLimit: 10312588 kB
>>> Committed_AS: 9760756 kB
>>
>> I suspect this may be it... Apparently, while you're only using about
>> 2G, you've got 10G or so of outstanding commitments, and Linux is
>> refusing to allocate more.
>>
>> You probably want to up your overcommit_ratio, esp. in light of the fact
>> that you've only got 2G of swap on this box. I'd probably say up it to
>> 80, which would give you 14.8G of commitable memory, leaving some room
>> in-memory (1.2G) for cache/buffers and whatnot. Alternativly, you could
>> go for 90, which would allow commits up to 16.4G, so if everyone used
>> all their memory, you'd be into swap.
>
> Thanks for the advice. Should we have more than 2GB of swap available? I
> thought the goal for a Postgres system was to avoid swap use at all cost?
> Would it be better for us to add more swap, or adjust this
> overcommit_ratio as you discuss?
I'd do both. But only after I'd reduced work_mem. Given that
reducing work_mem removed the problem, it looks to me like pgsql is
requesting several large blocks of ram, then only using a small port
of them. But overcommit set to 2 means that the OS will not allow an
overcommit of memory to these allocations, the allocations fail, and
you get your error.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-09 20:36:43 | Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5 |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-02-09 20:33:31 | Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5 |