Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5

From: "Matt Magoffin" <postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us>
To: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5
Date: 2009-02-09 20:25:36
Message-ID: 49338.192.168.1.106.1234211136.squirrel@msqr.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> * Matt Magoffin (postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us) wrote:
>> [root(at)170226-db7 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
>> CommitLimit: 10312588 kB
>> Committed_AS: 9760756 kB
>
> I suspect this may be it... Apparently, while you're only using about
> 2G, you've got 10G or so of outstanding commitments, and Linux is
> refusing to allocate more.
>
> You probably want to up your overcommit_ratio, esp. in light of the fact
> that you've only got 2G of swap on this box. I'd probably say up it to
> 80, which would give you 14.8G of commitable memory, leaving some room
> in-memory (1.2G) for cache/buffers and whatnot. Alternativly, you could
> go for 90, which would allow commits up to 16.4G, so if everyone used
> all their memory, you'd be into swap.

Thanks for the advice. Should we have more than 2GB of swap available? I
thought the goal for a Postgres system was to avoid swap use at all cost?
Would it be better for us to add more swap, or adjust this
overcommit_ratio as you discuss?

Regards,
Matt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Magoffin 2009-02-09 20:32:41 Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5
Previous Message Matt Magoffin 2009-02-09 20:21:25 Re: Out of memory on SELECT in 8.3.5