From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Serge Fonville" <serge(dot)fonville(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Windows x64 Build |
Date: | 2008-11-15 21:51:05 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10811151351g75f41ccm2981822642421ec@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Serge Fonville
<serge(dot)fonville(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using PostgreSQL for quite a while now.
> And (pure out of interest) been trying to build a Windows x64 version of it.
There was a discussion of this very subject here a few months ago, you
should look that up. It explained a lot of the reasons there isn't
currently a 64bit windows build. One of the reasons I remember is
that postgresql's "shared memory" design is slow when you allocate
large amounts of it in windows, and that's one of the few reasons for
needing a 64 bit version of pgsql. I remember a few more reasons
popping up. I'm guessing it's a subject for the -hackers list though.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2008-11-15 22:05:40 | Re: Vacuum Full is *hideously* slow! |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-11-15 21:49:06 | Re: Vacuum Full is *hideously* slow! |