Re: PostgreSQL Windows x64 Build

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Serge Fonville" <serge(dot)fonville(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Windows x64 Build
Date: 2008-11-15 21:51:05
Message-ID: dcc563d10811151351g75f41ccm2981822642421ec@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Serge Fonville
<serge(dot)fonville(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using PostgreSQL for quite a while now.
> And (pure out of interest) been trying to build a Windows x64 version of it.

There was a discussion of this very subject here a few months ago, you
should look that up. It explained a lot of the reasons there isn't
currently a 64bit windows build. One of the reasons I remember is
that postgresql's "shared memory" design is slow when you allocate
large amounts of it in windows, and that's one of the few reasons for
needing a 64 bit version of pgsql. I remember a few more reasons
popping up. I'm guessing it's a subject for the -hackers list though.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phoenix Kiula 2008-11-15 22:05:40 Re: Vacuum Full is *hideously* slow!
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-11-15 21:49:06 Re: Vacuum Full is *hideously* slow!