| From: | Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication |
| Date: | 2020-11-19 20:46:19 |
| Message-ID: | dc37e0ba-50de-a640-5da5-5e6591ff4e8b@jakobs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I think he refers to a table without a PRIMARY KEY.
No, that's not a good idea, as it is never a good idea having a table
without a PRIMARY KEY.
PRIMARY KEYs are not an optional feature.
Am 19.11.20 um 21:40 schrieb David G. Johnston:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:39 PM Yambu <hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Is it recommended to do logical replication on a table without a
> primary?
>
>
> primary what?
>
> David J.
>
--
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| OpenPGP_0x8A579C93B31961BA.asc | application/pgp-keys | 16.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2020-11-19 21:13:30 | Re: select locks table for updates |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-11-19 20:40:11 | Re: Logical replication |