| From: | Yambu <hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication |
| Date: | 2020-11-19 21:14:17 |
| Message-ID: | CALhHtcDpGL1GLKgf3uFGxawBEBKvWVkAt-nd5D93s3Hdb9g5Qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Oh yes i meant primary key.
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:46 PM Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com> wrote:
> I think he refers to a table without a PRIMARY KEY.
>
> No, that's not a good idea, as it is never a good idea having a table
> without a PRIMARY KEY.
>
> PRIMARY KEYs are not an optional feature.
> Am 19.11.20 um 21:40 schrieb David G. Johnston:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:39 PM Yambu <hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Is it recommended to do logical replication on a table without a primary?
>>
>>
> primary what?
>
> David J.
>
> --
> Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michel SALAIS | 2020-11-19 22:31:59 | RE: select locks table for updates |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2020-11-19 21:13:30 | Re: select locks table for updates |