Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Matsumura, Ryo" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG
Date: 2019-02-11 09:58:04
Message-ID: da75d20ebc2dc59a764765b1a2b45413fa65a1ab.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Matsumura-san,

> I remove it and attach a new patch. Please review it.
> I feel sorry for asking you to reveiw without contribution.

Don't worry. There is one thing that I don't understand right now. YOu
change ecpg_store_input() to handle the bytea data type, yet you also
change ECPGset_desc() to not use ecpg_store_input() in case of an
bytea. This looks odd to me. Can you please explain that to me?

Thanks

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-02-11 09:59:20 Re: pgsql: Restrict the use of temporary namespace in two-phase transaction
Previous Message Alexey Kondratov 2019-02-11 09:56:45 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line