From: | ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER |
Date: | 2018-10-25 11:25:33 |
Message-ID: | d8ja7n2p8sy.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:36:41AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>>> Fair point. I was unsure about whether to complete every supported
>>> variant or just the new one. Updated patches attached.
>
>> One problem with this approach is that a user needs to use twice tab.
>> The first time is to show "EXECUTE", and the second time is to show
>> automatically "PROCEDURE" or "FUNCTION" automatically.
>
> Yeah. Why don't we keep the existing behavior of completing both
> words at once, but make it server-version-dependent which completion
> you get?
I did that initially, but because COMPLETE_WITH() requres constant
arguments, I had to repeat the whole list with just changing PROCEDURE
to FUNCTION, which I thought was undesirably repetitive. If there's a
more concise alternative to the below, or the consensus is that saving
one TAB press is worth it, I'll change it.
else if (HeadMatches("CREATE", "TRIGGER") && TailMatches("ON", MatchAny))
if (pset.sversion >= 110000)
COMPLETE_WITH("NOT DEFERRABLE", "DEFERRABLE", "INITIALLY",
"REFERENCING", "FOR", "WHEN (", "EXECUTE FUNCTION");
else
COMPLETE_WITH("NOT DEFERRABLE", "DEFERRABLE", "INITIALLY",
"REFERENCING", "FOR", "WHEN (", "EXECUTE PROCEDURE");
- ilmari
--
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Ullrich | 2018-10-25 11:28:45 | Re: Problem with EDB 11.0 Windows x64 distributions |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2018-10-25 10:54:04 | Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? |