Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE

From: ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=)
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE
Date: 2018-12-21 13:57:40
Message-ID: d8j4lb7f0dn.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:02:52AM +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> Point, fixed in the attached v4. OTOH, as I mentioned in my other
>> email, that runs into the problem that it won't complete the actions
>> after e.g. "CREATE TEMP TABLE FOO () WITH () ON COMMIT".
>
> I am fine to do that later on if that's adapted, one complication being
> that the completion is dependent on the order of the clauses for CREATE
> TABLE as we need something compatible with CREATE TABLE commands bundled
> with CREATE SCHEMA calls so only tail checks can be done.

Yeah, because of that we can't do the obvious HeadMatches("CREATE",
"TABLE") && (TailMatches(...) || TailMatches(...) || ...). I believe
this would require extending the match syntax with regex-like grouping,
alternation and repetition operators, which I'm not volunteering to do.

> So committed your last version after some comment tweaks and reordering
> the entries in alphabetical order.

Thanks!

- ilmari
--
"The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law
"Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with
the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-21 14:38:42 Re: tickling the lesser contributor's withering ego
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-21 13:43:57 Re: Clean up some elog messages and comments for do_pg_stop_backup and do_pg_start_backup