On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:57:40PM +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Yeah, because of that we can't do the obvious HeadMatches("CREATE",
> "TABLE") && (TailMatches(...) || TailMatches(...) || ...). I believe
> this would require extending the match syntax with regex-like grouping,
> alternation and repetition operators, which I'm not volunteering to
> do.
That seems to be a lot of work for little benefit as few queries are
able to work within CREATE SCHEMA, so I would not take this road.
--
Michael