Re: Transactional DDL

my bad.. i replied to that in a wrong thread. sorry

On 6/2/07, Leif B. Kristensen <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 2. June 2007 20:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >You were politely asked not to top-post.
> >
> >On 06/02/07 11:46, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> >> So, while writing any technical document, would it be wrong to
> >> mention stored procedures in postgresql?
> >> what is the general convention?
> >
> >Did I miss something? What does "stored procedures" have to do with
> > "Transactional DDL"?
>
> I believe that he posted this in reply to the "Stored procedures and
> functions" thread. It kind of fits in there.
> --
> Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
> http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
> My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>