Re: Transactional DDL

From: "Leif B(dot) Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL
Date: 2007-06-02 19:52:13
Message-ID: 200706022152.14013.leif@solumslekt.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Saturday 2. June 2007 20:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
>You were politely asked not to top-post.
>
>On 06/02/07 11:46, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
>> So, while writing any technical document, would it be wrong to
>> mention stored procedures in postgresql?
>> what is the general convention?
>
>Did I miss something? What does "stored procedures" have to do with
> "Transactional DDL"?

I believe that he posted this in reply to the "Stored procedures and
functions" thread. It kind of fits in there.
--
Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Nolan 2007-06-02 20:24:04 Re: Corruption of files in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-02 19:18:25 Re: Transactional DDL