Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel

On 10/12/2018 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> I'm asking again, what exactly do we test by having these types in the
>> dump? They're bog standard types, there's nothing new for pg_dump to
>> test with them. No weird typmod rules, no weird parse-time type mapping,
>> nothing?
> That's a pretty fair point. The types' I/O functions will be exercised
> well enough by the regression tests themselves, and it's hard to see what
> more test coverage is gained by including them in pg_dump/pg_upgrade
> testing. Maybe we should just drop those tables and be done with it.
>

If you're happy with that then go for it. It will be less work for me ;-)

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services