Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Date: 2018-10-12 23:34:53
Message-ID: 24584.1539387293@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/12/2018 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's a pretty fair point. The types' I/O functions will be exercised
>> well enough by the regression tests themselves, and it's hard to see what
>> more test coverage is gained by including them in pg_dump/pg_upgrade
>> testing. Maybe we should just drop those tables and be done with it.

> If you're happy with that then go for it. It will be less work for me ;-)

Done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-10-12 23:47:40 Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2018-10-12 23:02:54 Re: Maximum password length