| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
| Date: | 2021-06-09 17:36:06 |
| Message-ID: | d70c8ee9-aa1b-0141-58e1-5ff359241f29@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.06.21 04:51, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
>> test deadlock-hard ... ok 10624 ms
>> test deadlock-soft ... ok 147 ms
>> test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms
>> test deadlock-parallel ... ok 132 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok 553 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok 234 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok 2389 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok 1876 ms
>> Make the test output visually consistent, as previously done by commit
>> 14378245.
> Not bad, but I would instead shorten the names to detach-[1234] or
> detach-partition-[1234]. The marginal value of the second word is low, and
> the third word helps even less.
DETACH CONCURRENTLY is a separate feature from plain DETACH.
But "partition" is surely redundant here.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-06-09 17:37:01 | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-09 17:25:59 | Re: Add PortalDrop in exec_execute_message |