Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof

On 4/23/22 13:36, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Am Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:14:03PM +0200 schrieb Karsten Hilbert:
>
>> I can't find anything in the changelog saying that "is of"
>> was removed. For what it's worth, nothing in the docs ever
>> said it existed either (though it did, as per real life).
>
> Oh, wait,
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1129826.1605805700@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> is that it ? It is gone ?
>
> Alright, alright,
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1052846.1605802012@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> I am rewriting my code already. Interesting how one discovers
> the proper search strategy only eventually, *after* asking for
> help.

Also the actual commit:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=926fa801ac9eb54c5275472271ec63a059904698
>
> Anyway, so there, "IS OF" (the old PG one, at any rate) is
> gone.
>
> Thanks,
> Karsten
> --
> GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com