| From: | Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof |
| Date: | 2022-04-23 20:36:11 |
| Message-ID: | YmRjO+rzHdcfJi9W@hermes.hilbert.loc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:14:03PM +0200 schrieb Karsten Hilbert:
> I can't find anything in the changelog saying that "is of"
> was removed. For what it's worth, nothing in the docs ever
> said it existed either (though it did, as per real life).
Oh, wait,
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1129826.1605805700@sss.pgh.pa.us
is that it ? It is gone ?
Alright, alright,
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1052846.1605802012@sss.pgh.pa.us
I am rewriting my code already. Interesting how one discovers
the proper search strategy only eventually, *after* asking for
help.
Anyway, so there, "IS OF" (the old PG one, at any rate) is
gone.
Thanks,
Karsten
--
GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2022-04-23 20:36:21 | Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-04-23 20:15:21 | Re: SELECT creates millions of temp files in a single directory |