Re: Logging parallel worker draught

From: Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Date: 2024-10-14 20:20:11
Message-ID: d4825c9e-9fd0-440e-aa3a-411f0b92bfc9@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.08.2024 15:58, Benoit Lobréau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a new version of the patch. Sorry for the long delay, I was
> hit by a motivation drought and was quite busy otherwise.
>
> The guc is now called `log_parallel_workers` and has three possible
> values:
>
> * "none": disables logging
> * "all": logs parallel worker info for all parallel queries or utilities
> * "failure": logs only when the number of parallel workers planned
> couldn't be reached.
>
> For this, I added several members to the EState struct.
>
> Each gather node / gather merge node updates the values and the
> offending queries are displayed during standard_ExecutorEnd.
>
> For CREATE INDEX / REINDEX on btree and brin, I check the parallel
> context struct (pcxt) during _bt_end_parallel() or
> _brin_end_parallel() and display a log message when needed.
>
> For vacuum, I do the same in parallel_vacuum_end().
>
> I added some information to the error message for parallel queries as
> an experiment. I find it useful, but it can be removed, if you re not
> convinced.
>
> 2024-08-27 15:59:11.089 CEST [54585] LOG:  1 parallel nodes planned (1
> obtained all their workers, 0 obtained none), 2 workers planned (2
> workers launched)
> 2024-08-27 15:59:11.089 CEST [54585] STATEMENT:  EXPLAIN (ANALYZE)
>         SELECT i, avg(j) FROM test_pql GROUP BY i;
>
> 2024-08-27 15:59:14.006 CEST [54585] LOG:  2 parallel nodes planned (0
> obtained all their workers, 1 obtained none), 4 workers planned (1
> workers launched)
> 2024-08-27 15:59:14.006 CEST [54585] STATEMENT:  EXPLAIN (ANALYZE)
>         SELECT i, avg(j) FROM test_pql GROUP BY i
>         UNION
>         SELECT i, avg(j) FROM test_pql GROUP BY i;
>
> For CREATE INDEX / REDINDEX / VACUUMS:
>
> 2024-08-27 15:58:59.769 CEST [54521] LOG:  1 workers planned (0
> workers launched)
> 2024-08-27 15:58:59.769 CEST [54521] STATEMENT:  REINDEX TABLE test_pql;
>
> Do you think this is better?
>
> I am not sure if a struct is needed to store the es_nworkers* and if
> the modification I did to parallel.h is ok.
>
> Thanks to: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais, Guillaume Lelarge and Franck
> Boudehen for the help and motivation boost.

Hi!

I think it's a good idea to log this. I suggest some changes that might
improve your patch.

1. I think you should rewrite the first statement of the documentation
about parameter as follows:

Controls a log message about the number of workers produced during an
execution of the parallel query or utility statement.

2. I think you can transfer nworkers_to_launch and nworkers_launched
vacuum parameters in the ParallelContext struct.

3. I think you should write the logging check condition in an
independent function and provide necessary parameters for that. To be
honest if the parameters weren't stored in a different struct for
parallel queries, I would have put it in a macro.

I attached the diff file including my proposals.

--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel_log_workers.no-cfbot text/plain 7.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-10-14 20:29:34 Re: Make foreach_ptr macro work in C++ extensions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-10-14 20:16:54 Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules