Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules
Date: 2024-10-14 20:16:54
Message-ID: 3814439.1728937014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Anyway, my thought was to merge this into the other patch series,
> but I didn't do that yet.

I'd forgotten about merging these two patches into the bigger
ecpg patch series. Since there didn't seem to be any objection
to either, I went ahead and pushed them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alena Rybakina 2024-10-14 20:20:11 Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-10-14 20:05:42 Make foreach_ptr macro work in C++ extensions