From: | "Sanjay Jain" <sminni_news(at)minisoftindia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication) |
Date: | 2005-04-19 02:32:33 |
Message-ID: | d41qj8$2tt0$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Also forgot to ask earlier
Will Postgres easily handle the 100GB+ database
Regards
Sanjay
"Sanjay Jain" <sminni_news(at)minisoftindia(dot)com> wrote in message
news:d3tpe5$2gti$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Hi,
>
> We have a system so far on oracle + PB (so far 18 sites)
> we want to port it to Postgres + dotnet
> for mass deployment
> 1. it will be in use at 50+ sites
> 2. Each site will have 1GB database (as per oracle)
> some tables have upwards on 1M rows
> 3. Each site will have 10-20 users
> 4. Application will be on a Dotnet platform
> 5. There will be a 2 tier replication
> only for committed data transfer asynchronously
> 6. It will be a totally WinXP/2003 (server) /
> Win98+ (Workstation) environment
> 7. Sites will not have skilled personnel and all admin
> will have to be done remotedly over slow dial up links
> or by sending updates on media
> 8. Its a commercial application
>
> Is Postgres a wise choice ?
>
> Regards
> Sanjay Jain
> www.minisoftindia.com
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-19 03:25:40 | Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB |
Previous Message | Jason Dixon | 2005-04-18 18:57:12 | Re: Great |