Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Sanjay Jain" <sminni_news(at)minisoftindia(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication)
Date: 2005-04-19 03:36:36
Message-ID: 200504182036.36600.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Sanjay,

> Also forgot to ask earlier
> Will Postgres easily handle the 100GB+ database

Depends on what you mean by "easily". I'd be very cautious about a 100GB+
database on Windows. We simply don't have much performance experience on
that platform.

That said, I know dozens of PG DBAs who are running 200GB or more databases on
Linux, BSD and Solaris.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jussi Mikkola 2005-04-19 06:59:39 Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB +
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-04-19 03:25:40 Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB