Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere
Date: 2025-01-31 09:32:54
Message-ID: d2b3e41175d20e890da2ada56ffd753439eefa1f.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'll set this patch to "ready for committer".
This is about the color of the bikeshed, and several people
have voiced their opinion. I don't think much more review
is needed. All that is needed is a committer who either
commits or rejects it.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-01-31 09:53:04 Re: Minor fix in pg_buffercache_evict documentation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2025-01-31 09:32:00 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?