Re: Minor fix in pg_buffercache_evict documentation

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor fix in pg_buffercache_evict documentation
Date: 2025-01-31 09:53:04
Message-ID: 5B267A82-BBBE-4511-8A28-3A3462EA090F@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 31 Jan 2025, at 07:03, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> All the functions in pg_buffercache module have their names suffixed
> with () and also use <function> tag in the documentation, except
> pg_buffercache_evict(). PFA patch to fix the style. With this change,
> the index entry and the section tile is displayed as "The
> pg_buffercache_evict() Function" instead of "The pg_buffercache_evict
> Function", which looks consistent with other function entries and
> section headers.
>
> This seems to be the only place where pg_buffercache_evict does not
> have suffix ().

I agree with this fix so I've applied it to master backpatched to v17 where
pg_buffercache_evict was introduced. Thanks!

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2025-01-31 10:15:24 Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-01-31 09:32:54 Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere