Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?

From: Thorsten Glaser <tg(at)evolvis(dot)org>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?
Date: 2023-05-18 19:07:32
Message-ID: d22f21d-e256-15aa-9d79-68522af2edd0@evolvis.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 18 May 2023, Ron wrote:

>> Why not using multiple clusters then?
>
> Yet More Firewall Rules to get approved by the Security Team.  And then they
> balk at port 5433 because they've never heard of it.

But mixing multiple customers on one cluster is much more of a risk.

> And from a technical point of view, one Postgresql system can better manage the
> memory on a VM than two which don't know about each other.

Probably true. Is there something with which multiple clusters running
on the same server can communicate to do that better?

bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message eacil 2023-05-18 19:21:23 Modeling combinations (options and dependencies)
Previous Message Ron 2023-05-18 18:56:48 Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?