Re: documentation structure

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation structure
Date: 2024-03-21 23:33:22
Message-ID: d085e464-e0b5-4c56-8a39-e75ba56ad953@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19.03.24 14:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> It's actually not very odd, the reference section is using <reference> elements
>> and we had missed the arabic numerals setting on those. The attached fixes
>> that for me. That being said, we've had roman numerals for the reference
>> section since forever (all the way down to the 7.2 docs online has it) so maybe
>> it was intentional?
>
> I'm quite sure it *was* intentional. Maybe it was a bad idea, but
> it's not that way simply because nobody thought about it.

Looks to me it was just that way because it's the default setting of the
stylesheets.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-03-21 23:37:19 Re: documentation structure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-03-21 23:30:52 Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded