| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation structure |
| Date: | 2024-03-19 13:50:36 |
| Message-ID: | 3813152.1710856236@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> It's actually not very odd, the reference section is using <reference> elements
> and we had missed the arabic numerals setting on those. The attached fixes
> that for me. That being said, we've had roman numerals for the reference
> section since forever (all the way down to the 7.2 docs online has it) so maybe
> it was intentional?
I'm quite sure it *was* intentional. Maybe it was a bad idea, but
it's not that way simply because nobody thought about it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sushrut Shivaswamy | 2024-03-19 14:22:44 | Read data from Postgres table pages |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-19 13:38:51 | Re: Reducing connection overhead in pg_upgrade compat check phase |