From: | "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Ajin Cherian" <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Smith" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Dilip Kumar" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions |
Date: | 2021-04-09 00:23:02 |
Message-ID: | d01e595a-a465-495b-b166-a60125abcd5c@www.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, at 4:25 AM, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> Updated.
- Protocol version. Currently only version <literal>1</literal> is
- supported.
- </para>
+ Protocol version. Currently versions <literal>1</literal> and
+ <literal>2</literal> are supported. The version <literal>2</literal>
+ is supported only for server versions 14 and above, and is used to allow
+ streaming of large in-progress transactions.
+ </para>
s/server versions/server version/
I suggest that the last part of the sentence might be "and it allows streaming
of large in-progress transactions"
+ Since: 2
+</para>
+<para>
I didn't like this style because it is not descriptive enough. It is also not a
style adopted by Postgres. I suggest to add something like "This field was
introduced in version 2" or "This field is available since version 2" after the
field description.
+ Xid of the sub-transaction (will be same as xid of the transaction for top-level
+ transactions).
+</para>
Although, sub-transaction is also used in the documentation, I suggest to use
subtransaction. Maybe change the other sub-transaction occurrences too.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com | 2021-04-09 00:23:07 | RE: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-04-09 00:21:52 | Re: Simplify backend terminate and wait logic in postgres_fdw test |