Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Date: 2021-04-08 07:25:33
Message-ID: CAFPTHDbSmNWmh0CJXZZ=hEDY2iAmsoc55apCQ9b197_P2EnpDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> 1.
> I felt that this protocol documentation needs to include something
> like a "Since: 2" notation (e.g. see how the javadoc API [1] does it)
> otherwise with more message types and more protocol versions it is
> quickly going to become too complicated to know what message or
> message attribute belongs with what protocol.
>
>
> Updated.

> 2.
> There are inconsistent terms used for a transaction id.
> e.g.1 Sometimes called " Transaction id."
> e.g.2 Sometimes called "Xid of the transaction"
> I think there should be consistent terminology used on this page
>

Updated.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-doc-Update-information-of-new-messages-for-logica.patch application/octet-stream 7.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-08 07:52:01 Re: Can we remove extra memset in BloomInitPage, GinInitPage and SpGistInitPage when we have it in PageInit?
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2021-04-08 07:24:55 Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration