From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: "create publication..all tables" ignore 'partition not supported' error |
Date: | 2017-06-01 01:26:33 |
Message-ID: | cfd6a11f-ab6a-349a-55ac-60a2e4faa782@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/31/17 02:17, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd say we can fix this issue by just changing the query. Attached
>> patch changes the query so that it can handle publication name
>> correctly, the query gets complex, though.
>>
> In is_publishable_class function, there are four conditions to decide
> whether this is a publishable class or not.
>
> 1. relkind == RELKIND_RELATION
> 2. IsCatalogClass()
> 3. relpersistence == 'p'
> 4. relid >= FirstNormalObjectId /* Skip tables created during initdb */
>
> I think the modified query should have a check for the fourth condition as well.
The query should be fixed like in the attached patch.
pg_get_publication_tables() ends up calling is_publishable_class()
internally.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-psql-Fix-display-of-whether-table-is-part-of-publica.patch | text/plain | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-06-01 01:27:56 | Re: Replication origins and timelines |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-01 01:23:25 | Re: Replication origins and timelines |