| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea |
| Date: | 2022-02-23 13:43:38 |
| Message-ID: | cb9b50bb-c3aa-94f2-5407-fd860f94d947@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/22/22 15:54, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-22 15:10:30 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'll be surprised if we can't come up with something cleaner than that.
> Suggestions?
If we just have the sig handler actions as:
diag("died: $_[0]");
done_testing();
we get:
ok 1 - foo
# died: blorb at tst/tst.pl line 5.
1..1
# Looks like your test exited with 25 just after 1.
Would that work?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nitin Jadhav | 2022-02-23 14:23:28 | Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs) |
| Previous Message | Nitin Jadhav | 2022-02-23 13:37:01 | Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs) |