Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535
Date: 2023-07-02 13:50:47
Message-ID: cb378dbe-bae2-24cd-2dee-573f6454a22d@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/2/23 15:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2021-06-11 18:44:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I suggest what we do is leave it in place for long enough to get
>>> a round of reports from those slow animals, and then (assuming
>>> those reports are positive) drop the test.
>
>> I think two years later is long enough to have some confidence in this being
>> fixed?
>
> +1, time to drop it (in the back branches too).
>

OK, will do (unless someone else wants to handle this) on Monday.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tommy Pavlicek 2023-07-02 14:42:53 Re: [PATCH] Extend ALTER OPERATOR to support adding commutator, negator, hashes, and merges
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-07-02 13:23:40 Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535