| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fdw batch insert error out when set batch_size > 65535 |
| Date: | 2023-07-03 16:48:14 |
| Message-ID: | c737bf86-39e3-d28f-8ca9-de89090acbc2@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/2/23 15:50, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 7/2/23 15:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>>> On 2021-06-11 18:44:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I suggest what we do is leave it in place for long enough to get
>>>> a round of reports from those slow animals, and then (assuming
>>>> those reports are positive) drop the test.
>>
>>> I think two years later is long enough to have some confidence in this being
>>> fixed?
>>
>> +1, time to drop it (in the back branches too).
>>
>
> OK, will do (unless someone else wants to handle this) on Monday.
>
FWIW I've removed the test from all branches where it was present.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-07-03 17:43:07 | Re: Optionally using a better backtrace library? |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-07-03 16:42:28 | Re: [PATCH] Add <<none>> support to sepgsql_restorecon |