Re: Mimic ALIAS in Postgresql?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mimic ALIAS in Postgresql?
Date: 2024-01-16 19:24:32
Message-ID: cadba02c-a185-4d39-bd83-a767d54d3945@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 1/16/24 10:11 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:40 PM Adrian Klaver
> <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 1/16/24 09:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Some RDBMSs have CREATE ALIAS, which allows you to refer to a
> table by a
> > different name (while also referring to it by the original name).
> >
>
> >
> > Maybe updatable views?
> > CREATE VIEW mtqry.sometable AS SELECT * FROM mtuser.sometable;
> >
>
> Assuming sometable is the same name in both schemas then the above
> will
> not work as:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createview.html
>
> "The name of the view must be distinct from the name of any other
> relation (table, sequence, index, view, materialized view, or foreign
> table) in the same schema."
>
> You would get a conflict with the existing table MTQRY.sometable.
>
>
> > CREATE VIEW mtqry.sometable AS SELECT * FROM mtuser.sometable;
> But mtqry is not the same schema as mtuser..
>
> dba=# create schema mtuser;
> CREATE SCHEMA
> dba=# create schema mtqry;
> CREATE SCHEMA
> dba=#
> dba=# create table mtuser.sometable(f1 int);
> CREATE TABLE
> dba=#
> dba=# create view mtqry.sometable as select * from mtuser.sometable;
> CREATE VIEW
>
> But what are the down-sides that I haven't thought of?

What happened to the MYQRY schema in your OP?

In the above you still have a relation with the same name in different
schema.

How does that change the issue?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2024-01-16 19:40:45 Re: Mimic ALIAS in Postgresql?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-01-16 19:18:37 Re: pg_dump Running Slow