| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |
| Date: | 2016-08-31 01:45:53 |
| Message-ID: | c8ab4593-eb90-5198-6cd7-fb354ad9b72b@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 08/30/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> ??? It's always been possible for me to give multiple standbys the same
>> name, making a de-facto group.
>
> A "group" grammar, by that I mean an alias referring to a set of
> nodes, is not supported. And you can still define multiple entries
> with the same name.
>
Yeah, so what happens in the case I described? Is the master just
looking for that number of commits, or is it looking for a commit from
g1 and from g2?
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-08-31 01:51:04 | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-08-31 01:42:23 | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |